Author Guidelines

About the Journal

Aims and Scope

Greensusmater is dedicated to promoting scientific advancement in materials that enable sustainable development, environmental protection, and circular economy practices. The editors welcome comprehensive articles, short communications, and reviews addressing the use of green and sustainable materials to solve global problems with an emphasis on the materials aspect. Papers submitted to Greensusmater must fall within the two main scopes:

1. Sensing and eliminating contamination and hazardous materials
2. Design of synthesis processes and materials with a sustainable approach

Topics of Interest

• Biomaterials
• Soil, water, and air remediation
• Photocatalysis
• Gas capture, separation, and storage
• Sensors
• Materials for clean energy
• Green processes and technology
• Sustainable waste management
• Materials for green building
• Biodegradable plastics
• Other topics addressing the use of green and sustainable materials to solve global problems with an emphasis on the materials aspect

Article Types

• Original Research Articles: Novel research with significant contributions to the field of green and sustainable materials
• Review Articles: Comprehensive reviews of state-of-the-art topics in sustainable materials science

Peer Review Process

This journal follows a single-blind peer review process. All submissions will initially be assessed by our editors to determine suitability for publication in this journal. If suitable, it will be peer reviewed by at least two anonymous reviewers. The reviewers will be selected from the editorial board and a panel of external experts. The reviewers will be asked to evaluate the manuscript based on its originality, significance, methodology, and clarity. The reviewers will provide a detailed report with their recommendations. The decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be made by the editors based on the reviews and the recommendations of the editorial board.

Our editorial board members are not involved in making decisions about papers in which they have written themselves, have been written by colleagues, or have a close relationship with the authors, or relate to products or services in which they have an interest. Any such submissions will be subject to the journal's common procedures and peer review will be handled independently by another editor.

Special Issues and Article Collections

Submissions to special issues and article collections undergo a rigorous peer review process that maintains the same high standards as applied to regular manuscript submissions. However, the editorial workflow incorporates specific arrangements to accommodate the specialized nature of these thematic publications. For special issues and article collections, the appointed guest editor assumes full responsibility for managing the peer review process. While the guest editor exercises full authority in managing the review process, the Editor-in-Chief maintains overarching oversight to ensure adherence to the journal's established standards.

Open Access Policy

Greensusmater follows a fully open-access publishing model, providing immediate and free access to all articles. Authors retain copyright under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license, allowing for unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Open Access Model

This journal provides immediate open access to all published content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. All articles are published under an open access license, allowing readers to access, download, and share research without restriction.

Article Processing Charges (APCs)

To support the cost of peer review, editorial management, production, and online hosting, authors are required to pay an Article Processing Charge (APC) upon acceptance of their manuscript.

APC Structure

The APC structure is as follows:

• Standard APC: USD $200
• Payment is due: Upon acceptance of the manuscript, prior to publication.
• Invoicing: The invoice will be sent to the corresponding author after acceptance of the manuscript.

APC Waiver: The APC is currently waived for all submissions. Authors are encouraged to check the journal website for the latest APC waiver status before submission.

Publishing Frequency

Greensusmater publishes two issues per year, with continuous publication of articles online as soon as they are accepted and finalized.

Archiving and Indexing

Greensusmater ensures the long-term preservation and accessibility of its published content through reliable digital archiving services. The journal participates in the PKP Preservation Network (PKP PN), a distributed digital preservation service provided by the Public Knowledge Project (PKP). Through this service, journal content is securely archived and preserved to ensure permanent access, even in the event that the journal is no longer published or available online.

The journal is indexed in Crossref, Google Scholar, and other services to increase discoverability and citation impact.

Publisher

Greensusmater is published by the Green and Sustainable Materials Society (GSMS), Indonesia, in collaboration with academic partners and materials research communities. The editorial board includes multidisciplinary scholars from universities and research institutions worldwide.

Publication Ethics and Policies

Introduction

Greensusmater is committed to upholding the highest standards of publication ethics and adheres to the guidelines established by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). This statement outlines the ethical responsibilities and expectations for all parties involved in the publication process: authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher.

The journal is dedicated to ensuring the integrity of the scholarly record and takes allegations of misconduct seriously. All stakeholders are expected to adhere to these ethical standards to maintain trust in the scientific process and the credibility of published research.

Ethical Responsibilities of Authors

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors must ensure that their submitted work is entirely original. Any work or words from other sources must be appropriately cited and quoted. Plagiarism in all its forms constitutes unethical behaviour and is unacceptable.

Plagiarism Screening: All submissions are screened using plagiarism detection software. Manuscripts with a similarity index exceeding 20% (excluding references and methodology sections) will be subject to editorial review and may be rejected without peer review. Authors are encouraged to check their manuscripts for unintentional plagiarism before submission.

Forms of plagiarism include but are not limited to:

• Direct copying of text without proper attribution
• Paraphrasing another's work without citation
• Self-plagiarism (reusing substantial portions of one's own previously published work)
• Mosaic plagiarism (piecing together uncited phrases from multiple sources)

Authorship and Contributorship

Authorship should be limited to those who have made significant contributions to the conception, design, execution, analysis, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made substantial contributions should be listed as co-authors.

Criteria for Authorship (based on ICMJE guidelines):

1. Substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data, or analysis and interpretation of data
2. Drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content
3. Final approval of the version to be published
4. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work

All four criteria must be met to qualify for authorship.

Contributors who do not meet all four criteria should be acknowledged in the Acknowledgments section. The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that all appropriate co-authors are included and that all co-authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and agreed to its submission.

We encourage the use of a contributorship statement, where each author's specific contribution to the work is clearly stated. This enhances transparency and accountability by providing a detailed account of each author's role in the research.

Authorship Disputes: Changes to authorship (adding, removing, or reordering authors) after submission require written consent from all authors. The journal follows COPE guidelines for handling authorship disputes. For detailed procedures, refer to COPE Flowchart: https://publicationethics.org/authorship

Conflicts of Interest and Funding Disclosure

Authors must disclose all financial and non-financial competing interests that could be perceived to influence the interpretation or presentation of their research. This includes but is not limited to:

• Funding sources for the research
• Employment or consultancies
• Stock ownership or honoraria
• Paid expert testimony
• Patent applications or registrations
• Personal relationships with relevant organizations or individuals

Even if authors believe there are no conflicts, they must explicitly state "The authors declare no conflicts of interest" in their manuscript.

Data Access and Retention

Authors are expected to retain raw data related to their manuscript and provide it to the editorial office or reviewers upon request during the peer review and publication process. Data should be retained for a reasonable period after publication (minimum 5 years) to address any questions about the research.

Data Availability Statement

To promote research transparency and reproducibility, authors are strongly encouraged to include a Data Availability Statement indicating how readers can access the data underlying their findings. Acceptable statements include:

• Publicly available: "The data supporting the findings of this study are openly available in [repository name] at [DOI/URL]"
• Available on request: "The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request"
• Restricted access: "The data are not publicly available due to [privacy/ethical/legal restrictions]"
• No new data generated: "No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article"

Ethical Approval and Research Involving Living Organisms

Research involving human participants, human material, or identifiable human data must have been performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and must have received ethical approval from an appropriate institutional review board (IRB) or ethics committee. Informed consent must be obtained from all participants.

Research involving animals must comply with the ARRIVE guidelines (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) and institutional or national guidelines for the care and use of animals. Ethical approval from an appropriate animal ethics committee must be obtained.

Authors must include an "Ethics Statement" in their manuscript detailing:

• The name of the ethics committee or institutional review board that approved the study
• The approval number or reference
• A statement confirming that informed consent was obtained (for human studies)
• A statement confirming compliance with relevant animal welfare regulations (for animal studies)

Hazards and Safety

If the work involves chemicals, procedures, or equipment with unusual hazards inherent in their use, authors must clearly identify these in the manuscript. Authors should include relevant safety data, including proper handling procedures and disposal methods for hazardous materials used in experiments.

Fundamental Errors in Published Work

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in their own published work, it is their obligation to promptly notify the journal editor and cooperate in retracting or correcting the paper. If the editor or publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains a significant error, the author must promptly retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor of the correctness of the original paper.

Duplicate, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

Authors must not submit manuscripts describing essentially the same research to more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical behaviour and is unacceptable.

Prior Publication: Articles that have been published in full in another peer-reviewed journal will not be considered for publication. However, the following are generally acceptable:

• Publication in conference proceedings that are not peer-reviewed
• Preliminary reports in newsletters or similar outlets
• Preprint servers (see Preprint Policy below)

Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools

Greensusmater recognizes that Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools (such as ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, and similar systems) are increasingly used in research and scientific writing. These tools may support productivity and communication, but their use must be transparent, responsible, and consistent with research integrity and publication ethics.

General Principles:

• Authors, reviewers, and editors remain fully responsible for all content submitted to Greensusmater, including any text, data, images, or analysis generated with GenAI
• GenAI tools cannot be listed as authors and cannot take responsibility for the work
• Users must ensure that any GenAI-assisted content is accurate, original, and free from plagiarism, data fabrication, falsification, or breaches of confidentiality

Permitted Uses:

• Language editing (grammar, spelling, clarity, and style)
• Drafting or rephrasing non-technical text (e.g., cover letters, general background)
• Idea exploration and brainstorming, followed by critical human evaluation
• Literature search and organization
• Data analysis and visualization
• Code generation and debugging

Prohibited Uses:

• AI tools cannot be listed as authors, as they cannot fulfill authorship criteria (accountability, approval, etc.)
• Using AI to fabricate or manipulate data, results, figures, or references
• Generating whole manuscripts or substantial scientific sections without rigorous human oversight and validation
• Reproducing copyrighted or confidential material obtained from other sources
• Submitting AI-generated content without significant human intellectual contribution

Disclosure Requirements:

If GenAI tools are used in preparing a manuscript, authors must explicitly disclose this in the manuscript, for example in the Acknowledgments or a dedicated note, such as:

Author Responsibility: Authors remain fully responsible for the content of their manuscripts, including any AI-generated content. AI-generated text must be carefully reviewed, edited, and fact-checked before submission.

Reviewers and Editors: Reviewers and editors must not upload unpublished manuscripts or any confidential material into GenAI tools that may store, learn from, or reuse the content. Peer review reports and editorial decisions must be based on human scholarly judgment. The confidentiality of all submissions must be strictly maintained.

Image Manipulation

Digital image processing is acceptable only if it is applied equally across the entire image and does not obscure, eliminate, or misrepresent any information present in the original.

Acceptable Adjustments:

• Brightness, contrast, and color balance adjustments (applied to the entire image)
• Cropping to focus on relevant areas

Unacceptable Manipulations:

• Selective enhancement or alteration of specific features
• Addition, removal, or relocation of features
• Grouping of images from different parts of the same gel or from different gels, fields, or exposures (unless clearly indicated with dividing lines)
• Combining images from different experiments without clear demarcation

Authors may be asked to provide original, unprocessed images for comparison during the review process. Evidence of deliberate image manipulation to deceive will result in manuscript rejection or retraction.

Citation Manipulation

Authors must cite relevant work accurately and appropriately. Citations should be based on their relevance to the content, not to artificially inflate citation counts of particular authors, journals, or articles.

Prohibited Practices:

• Excessive self-citation without scientific justification
• Coercive citation (citations requested by editors or reviewers for the purpose of increasing their own citation counts)
• Citation cartels or citation stacking

Preprint Policy

The journal supports the dissemination of research through preprint servers and recognizes the importance of rapid sharing of findings, particularly in materials science where timely information can accelerate technological innovation.

Preprint Posting: Authors may post their manuscripts on preprint servers (such as arXiv, ChemRxiv, ResearchSquare, or institutional repositories) before, during, or after the submission and peer review process. Posting a preprint does not constitute prior publication and will not jeopardize consideration for publication in Greensusmater.

Requirements:

1. Authors should disclose the existence of the preprint at the time of submission
2. The preprint should include a statement that it is a preprint and has not yet been peer-reviewed
3. Once the article is published, authors should update the preprint with a link to the final published version

Version of Record: The journal-published version remains the definitive Version of Record and should be cited in preference to the preprint version.

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors

Decision-Making and Impartiality

Editors are responsible for deciding which submitted manuscripts should be published. The editorial board bases its decisions on the validity of the work, its importance to researchers and readers, and its relevance to the journal's scope.

Editors evaluate manuscripts solely on their intellectual merit, without regard to authors' race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy.

Confidentiality

Editors and editorial staff must not disclose information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the authors, reviewers, and potential reviewers. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Conflicts of Interest

Editors must recuse themselves from considering manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest arising from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with any of the authors, institutions, or organizations connected to the papers. Alternative members of the editorial board will handle such manuscripts.

Corrections, Clarifications, Retractions, and Apologies

Editors are responsible for ensuring the integrity of the published record. When errors are identified, editors must facilitate publication of corrections, clarifications, retractions, or apologies when needed. Retractions will follow COPE guidelines and will clearly indicate the reason for retraction.

Types of Post-Publication Corrections:

• Erratum: Error made by the journal (typesetting, editing)
• Corrigendum: Error made by the author(s) that does not affect the conclusions
• Retraction: Major errors, misconduct, or ethical violations that invalidate the findings

All post-publication corrections will be linked to the original article and will be freely accessible.

Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and may help authors improve their manuscripts. Reviewers have an obligation to provide timely, constructive, and unbiased feedback.

Timeliness and Responsiveness

Reviewers who do not feel qualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or know that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and decline to participate in the review process. Reviews should be completed within the agreed timeframe (typically 2-3 weeks).

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. Reviewers must not share manuscripts with others or discuss them with colleagues unless authorized by the editor. Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must remain confidential and not be used for personal advantage.

Objectivity and Constructive Criticism

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the authors is inappropriate. Reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments and provide constructive feedback that will help authors improve their work.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation.

Conflicts of Interest

Reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest that could bias their opinions of the manuscript and should decline to review manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Publisher Responsibilities

The publisher supports the journal editors in all stages of the editorial and publication process and in maintaining the integrity of the scholarly record. The publisher:

• Provides resources and guidance to editors and reviewers
• Investigates and addresses allegations of misconduct promptly and thoroughly
• Supports publication of corrections, retractions, and expressions of concern when necessary
• Ensures the journal adheres to relevant standards and best practices (COPE, DOAJ, OASPA)
• Maintains the technical infrastructure for secure manuscript submission and peer review
• Protects the confidentiality of authors, reviewers, and editors

Procedures for Handling Misconduct

Allegations of Misconduct

The journal takes allegations of misconduct seriously and will investigate all cases brought to our attention. Allegations may be submitted to the Editor-in-Chief.

Investigation Process

1. Initial Assessment: The editor will conduct a preliminary assessment to determine whether the allegation warrants investigation
2. Gathering Information: The editor will gather relevant information from authors, reviewers, and other parties
3. COPE Guidance: The journal follows COPE flowcharts for specific scenarios:
   • Suspected plagiarism: https://publicationethics.org/plagiarism
   • Suspected data fabrication: https://publicationethics.org/fabrication
   • Suspected reviewer misconduct: https://publicationethics.org/reviewer-misconduct
4. Institutional Notification: In cases of serious misconduct, the author's institution may be contacted
5. Decision and Action: Based on the investigation, appropriate action will be taken (rejection, retraction, correction, or no action)

Sanctions

Depending on the severity of the misconduct, sanctions may include:

• Rejection of the manuscript
• Retraction of published article
• Formal ban on submissions for a specified period
• Notification to the author's institution
• Notification to relevant professional bodies

Complaints and Appeals

If you have a concern, we encourage you to reach out directly to our editorial office via email, providing a detailed account of the issue along with any pertinent documentation. We commit to acknowledging your complaint within 7 business days and initiating a thorough review. Should you be dissatisfied with the outcome, we offer an appeals process whereby additional evidence can be submitted for review by an independent committee established by the publisher.

Authors have the right to appeal editorial decisions. Appeals should be submitted in writing to the Editor-in-Chief within 30 days of the decision, clearly stating the grounds for appeal. The appeal will be reviewed by members of the editorial board who were not involved in the original decision.

Compliance and Review

This Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement is reviewed regularly and updated as necessary to reflect evolving best practices and emerging issues in scholarly publishing. The journal maintains membership with COPE and participates in ongoing education about publication ethics.

For guidance on specific ethical issues, please refer to COPE resources at https://publicationethics.org/

Manuscript Preparations

General Requirements

Language

Manuscripts must be written in clear, concise English. Authors whose first language is not English are encouraged to have their manuscripts professionally edited before submission. Poor English may result in desk rejection or delay in the review process.

File Format

Manuscripts should be submitted as a single Microsoft Word document (.docx or .doc) containing all elements of the manuscript including title page, abstract, main text, references, tables, and figure captions. Figures should be embedded within the document at appropriate positions or placed at the end after the references.

Authors using LaTeX should convert their manuscript to PDF for submission, though LaTeX source files may be requested upon acceptance.

Flexible Submission Policy: At the initial submission phase, Greensusmater embraces a "Your Paper, Your Way" approach. You may submit your manuscript as a single Word/PDF file with a flexible structure. Upon reaching the revision stage, a more detailed structured format is required.

Article Types and Length

Greensusmater publishes several types of articles, each with specific length requirements. Please refer to the "About the Journal" section for detailed information on article types and their corresponding word limits. Word counts exclude the abstract, references, tables, and figure captions.

Formatting

• Page Setup: A4 or US Letter size with 2.5 cm (1 inch) margins on all sides
• Font: Times New Roman, 12-point font throughout the manuscript
• Line Spacing: Double-spaced throughout, including references and figure captions
• Line Numbering: Continuous line numbering throughout the manuscript to facilitate the review process
• Page Numbering: Consecutive page numbering starting from the title page
• Paragraphs: First line indented or separated by a blank line; do not use both methods

Manuscript Structure

Manuscripts should follow the Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion (IMRaD) format and be organized in the following order:

1. Title Page
2. Abstract and Keywords
3. Main Text (Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusions)
4. Acknowledgments (if applicable)
5. Data Availability Statement
6. Conflicts of Interest Statement
7. References
8. Tables (with captions)
9. Figure Captions
10. Figures

1. Title Page

The title page should include:

Title: Concise and informative, clearly reflecting the content of the manuscript. Avoid abbreviations and formulae where possible. Maximum 150 characters including spaces.

Authors: Full names of all authors with their institutional affiliations and email addresses. Use superscript numbers to link authors to their respective affiliations.

Corresponding Author: Clearly indicate the corresponding author with an asterisk (*) and provide complete contact information including email address, telephone number, and postal address.

ORCID iDs: All authors are encouraged to provide their ORCID identifiers.

Example:

2. Abstract and Keywords

Abstract: A concise abstract of 200-300 words that summarizes the key aspects of the research. The abstract should cover:

• Background: Brief context and research gap or problem statement
• Methods: Overview of methodology, materials, and analytical approaches
• Results: Main findings with key data or outcomes
• Conclusions: Significance of findings and implications for materials science or technology

The abstract should be self-contained and understandable without reference to the main text. Avoid citations, abbreviations (unless defined), and references to figures or tables.

Keywords: Provide 4-6 keywords that accurately reflect the content of the manuscript. Keywords should be specific and relevant to facilitate indexing and retrieval. Use lowercase letters except for proper nouns. Separate keywords with semicolons.

Example:

Keywords: photocatalysis; zinc oxide nanoparticles; hydrothermal synthesis; methylene blue degradation; wastewater treatment; green materials

3. Main Text

3.1 Introduction

The introduction should:

• Provide sufficient background to make the paper accessible to readers in related fields
• Clearly state the research problem, knowledge gap, or hypothesis
• Briefly summarize relevant literature, emphasizing recent developments
• Clearly state the objectives and scope of the study
• Avoid extensive literature review (this belongs in review articles)

3.2 Materials and Methods (or Experimental)

This section should provide sufficient detail to enable replication of the study. Include:

Materials:

• Description of all materials, precursors, and reagents used
• Chemical reagents with purity grades, CAS numbers (where appropriate), and suppliers
• Substrates or templates used in synthesis

Synthesis/Fabrication Procedures:

• Clear description of synthesis or fabrication methods
• Reaction conditions (temperature, time, pressure, atmosphere)
• Molar ratios, concentrations, and volumes
• Post-synthesis treatments (calcination, annealing, washing, drying)

Characterization Techniques:

• Equipment model numbers and manufacturers
• Measurement conditions and parameters
• Sample preparation for characterization
• Examples: XRD, SEM, TEM, FTIR, XPS, UV-Vis, BET, TGA/DSC, etc.

Performance Testing:

• Detailed procedures for performance evaluation (e.g., photocatalytic degradation, sensing, adsorption, electrochemical measurements)
• Testing conditions and parameters
• Control experiments

Data Analysis:

• Statistical methods and software used (with version numbers)
• Significance levels and tests applied
• Calculation methods for derived quantities

For established methods, cite the original reference and provide only a brief description. For modified methods, describe modifications in detail. For novel methods, provide complete details.

3.3 Results

Present findings clearly and logically, using text, tables, and figures.

• Report results without interpretation (save for Discussion)
• Use past tense when describing your results
• Present data efficiently; avoid redundancy between text, tables, and figures
• Include appropriate statistical measures (means, standard deviations, error bars)
• Ensure all figures and tables referenced in the text are included

3.4 Discussion

Interpret the results in the context of existing knowledge:

• Explain the significance of findings
• Compare results with previous studies
• Discuss limitations and uncertainties
• Address unexpected findings
• Propose mechanisms or explanations for observed behavior
• Explore broader implications for materials science, technology, or applications

The Results and Discussion sections may be combined if preferred, particularly for shorter articles or short communications.

3.5 Conclusions

Provide a concise summary of the main findings and their significance. The conclusions should:

• Directly address the research objectives stated in the introduction
• Highlight the novelty and contribution of the work
• Suggest directions for future research
• Discuss practical applications or technological implications where relevant

Avoid simply repeating the abstract or results. Do not introduce new information not discussed in the main text.

4. Acknowledgments

Recognize individuals, organizations, or funding sources that contributed to the research but do not qualify for authorship. This may include:

• Technical assistance
• Data provision
• Laboratory or equipment access
• Language editing services
• Funding sources (grant numbers should be included)

If AI tools were used in the research or writing process, include disclosure here (see Publication Ethics policy).

5. Data Availability Statement

Include a statement regarding the availability of data supporting the findings. See the Open Access Policy and Publication Ethics Statement for detailed requirements and examples.

6. Conflicts of Interest Statement

Authors must declare any financial or non-financial conflicts of interest. If no conflicts exist, state: "The authors declare no conflicts of interest."

7. References

Citation Style: Numbered Format

Greensusmater uses a numbered citation style with references in square brackets [1], [2], [3], etc., appearing in numerical order throughout the text.

In-Text Citations:

• Citations should be numbered consecutively in the order they first appear in the text
• Use square brackets: [1], [2], [3]
• Multiple citations: [1,2], [5-7] or [1-4]
• Place citation brackets before punctuation marks: "as shown by Smith [1]."

Reference List:

• List references in numerical order at the end of the manuscript
• Each reference should be numbered [1], [2], [3], etc.
• All authors should be listed (do not use "et al." in the reference list unless more than 10 authors)
• Include DOI when available

Reference Format Examples:

Journal Article:

[1] J. Mohapatra, P. Joshi, J. Ping Liu, Low-dimensional hard magnetic materials, Prog. Mater. Sci. 138 (2023) 101143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101143.

Journal Article (Multiple Authors):

[2] C. Zhang, X. Li, L. Jiang, D. Tang, H. Xu, P. Zhao, J. Fu, Q. Zhou, Y. Chen, 3D Printing of functional magnetic materials: From design to applications, Adv. Funct. Mater. 31 (2021) 2102777. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202102777.

Book:

[3] A.R. West, Solid State Chemistry and its Applications, 2nd ed., John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 2014.

Book Chapter:

[4] M.L. Garcia, P.J. Anderson, Nanostructured materials for energy applications, in: K. Smith (Ed.), Handbook of Sustainable Materials, Springer, Berlin, 2019, pp. 456-478.

Conference Paper:

[5] L. Chen, K. Yamamoto, S. Patel, Green synthesis of metal oxide nanoparticles for photocatalytic applications, in: Proc. Int. Conf. Sustain. Mater., Tokyo, Japan, 2021, pp. 234-241.

Online Resource/Website:

[6] International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook 2023, IEA, Paris, 2023. https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-outlook-2023 (accessed December 1, 2024).

Thesis/Dissertation:

[7] J.K. Lee, Assessment of photocatalytic nanomaterials for water purification, Ph.D. thesis, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 2020.

Patent:

[8] A.B. Smith, C.D. Johnson, Method for synthesizing biodegradable polymer composites, U.S. Patent 10,123,456, 2020.

Notes:

• Abbreviate journal names according to ISO 4 standards
• Use volume number (year) page range format
• Include DOI at the end of each reference when available
• For online sources, include access date if content may change
• Preprints should be cited with the preprint server name and DOI

Reference Management Software: Authors are encouraged to use reference management tools such as EndNote, Mendeley, or Zotero.

8. Tables

Format:

• Tables should be editable (not images) and created using the table function in Word
• Each table should have a concise caption placed above the table
• Number tables consecutively (Table 1, Table 2, etc.) in order of citation
• Tables should be self-explanatory and understandable without reference to the text
• Use footnotes (a, b, c) to explain abbreviations and provide additional information

Content:

• Keep tables simple; avoid excessive subdivision
• Align numbers by decimal point
• Use consistent decimal places for comparable values
• Include units in column headings
• Define all abbreviations in table footnotes

Example:

9. Figures

Preparation:

• Figures should be of high quality and suitable for publication
• Minimum resolution: 300 dpi for color and grayscale images; 1000 dpi for line art
• File formats: TIFF, EPS, or high-resolution JPEG/PNG
• Size: Figures should fit within the journal's column width (85 mm) or page width (170 mm)
• Color: Color figures are encouraged for online publication; ensure figures remain clear when printed in grayscale if necessary

Figure Captions:

• Place all figure captions together on a separate page after the references
• Number figures consecutively (Figure 1, Figure 2, etc.)
• Captions should be self-contained, providing sufficient information to understand the figure without reference to the text
• Define all abbreviations and symbols used in the figure
• Include scale bars for micrographs (SEM, TEM, optical microscopy images)

Content Guidelines:

• Keep figures simple and focused on the key message
• Use clear, readable fonts (minimum 8-point after reduction)
• Ensure adequate contrast and avoid excessive detail
• For graphs, clearly label axes with units
• For micrographs, include scale bars and magnification information
• For crystal structures or molecular models, clearly label atoms and bonds

Special Considerations for Materials Science:

XRD Patterns:

• Label peaks with corresponding Miller indices (hkl)
• Include reference pattern (JCPDS/ICDD card number)
• Clearly label 2θ axis and intensity axis

Electron Micrographs (SEM/TEM):

• Include scale bars on all micrographs
• State accelerating voltage and other imaging conditions in the caption or methods
• Include particle size distribution histograms where appropriate

Spectroscopy Data (FTIR, Raman, UV-Vis, XPS):

• Label characteristic peaks with corresponding assignments
• Use appropriate axis labels with units (e.g., Wavenumber (cm⁻¹), Binding Energy (eV))

Example Caption:

Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of ZnO nanoparticles synthesized at different hydrothermal temperatures (120, 150, and 180 °C). Reference pattern: JCPDS No. 36-1451. (b) SEM micrograph of ZnO-180 showing nanorod morphology. Scale bar = 500 nm. (c) UV-Vis absorption spectra with the inset showing Tauc plot for bandgap estimation.

10. Graphical Abstract

A well-crafted graphical abstract is encouraged to capture the essence of the study and engage a broader audience. The graphical abstract should:

• Summarize the main findings in a visually appealing and accessible manner
• Be submitted as a separate high-resolution image file
• Size: 800 × 400 pixels (width × height)
• Resolution: Minimum 300 dpi
• Format: TIFF, PNG, or high-resolution JPEG
• Use minimal text and clear, self-explanatory graphics

11. Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials support the main manuscript but are not essential for understanding the core findings. They are published online only and not peer-reviewed unless they contain critical methodological details.

Content:

• Additional figures, tables, or datasets
• Extended methodological details
• Video or audio files
• Computer code or algorithms
• Large datasets (consider depositing in appropriate repositories)

Requirements:

• File format: PDF for documents; common formats for other media (MP4 for video, CSV for data)
• Size limit: Total size should not exceed 100 MB. For larger datasets, deposit in appropriate repositories (see Data Availability Statement)
• Naming: Use clear, descriptive filenames (e.g., Supplementary_Figure_S1.pdf, Supplementary_Table_S2.xlsx)
• Captions: Provide a separate document listing all supplementary materials with brief descriptions

Citation: Reference supplementary materials in the main text as "Supplementary Figure S1," "Supplementary Table S2," etc.

Additional Guidelines

Units and Nomenclature

SI Units: Use International System of Units (SI) throughout the manuscript. Common exceptions include:

• Ångströms (Å) for crystallographic parameters
• Electron volts (eV) for bandgap and binding energies
• Liters (L) instead of dm³
• Minutes (min), hours (h), days (d) for time

Chemical Nomenclature:

• Follow IUPAC conventions
• Define all chemical abbreviations at first use
• Use systematic names for clarity
• Use standard chemical formulas (e.g., TiO₂, ZnO, Fe₃O₄)

Materials Nomenclature:

• Use standard nomenclature for crystal structures and phases
• Include space group information where relevant
• Specify JCPDS/ICDD card numbers for XRD reference patterns

Abbreviations

• Define all abbreviations at first mention in the abstract and again in the main text
• Use standard abbreviations where available (e.g., XRD, SEM, TEM, FTIR, XPS, BET, UV-Vis)
• Avoid excessive abbreviations; spell out if used fewer than three times
• Consider including a list of abbreviations for manuscripts with numerous technical terms

Mathematical Equations

• Number equations consecutively using Arabic numerals in parentheses on the right margin
• Reference equations in text as "Eq. (1)," "Eqs. (2) and (3)"
• Use the equation editor or MathType for complex equations
• Define all variables and parameters immediately after the equation or in a nomenclature section

Example:

Statistical Reporting

• Report test statistics with degrees of freedom and p-values where applicable
• Provide confidence intervals where appropriate
• Define significance levels (typically α = 0.05)
• Include error bars in figures and specify their meaning (standard deviation, standard error, confidence interval)
• Specify software used with version numbers

Permissions and Copyright

Authors are responsible for obtaining permission to reproduce any copyrighted material, including:

• Figures or tables from other publications
• Photographs of identifiable individuals
• Extensive quotations from other sources

Include a copyright permission statement in the figure or table caption.

Before Submission: Checklist

Before submitting your manuscript, please ensure:

• Manuscript is formatted according to these guidelines
• Line and page numbering are enabled
• Abstract covers background, methods, results, and conclusions (200-300 words)
• 4-6 keywords provided
• All author information is complete (names, affiliations, emails, ORCID)
• Corresponding author is clearly indicated
• Main text follows the required IMRaD structure
• All citations are in numbered format and referenced correctly
• All references cited in text appear in the reference list and vice versa
• All tables and figures are cited in the text
• Figure resolution meets minimum requirements (300 dpi)
• Scale bars are included on all micrographs
• Table and figure captions are complete and self-explanatory
• All abbreviations are defined at first use
• SI units are used consistently
• Data Availability Statement is included
• Conflicts of Interest Statement is included
• Ethics Statement is included (if applicable)
• Supplementary materials are properly formatted and described (if applicable)
• Graphical abstract is prepared (recommended)
• Permissions obtained for copyrighted material (if applicable)
• Manuscript has been carefully proofread for language and clarity
• All co-authors have approved the final version

Manuscript Template

Authors are encouraged to use the manuscript template available on the journal website. The template is pre-formatted according to these guidelines and includes placeholder text to guide manuscript preparation.

Manuscript Submissions and Review Process

Overview

Greensusmater employs a rigorous peer review process to ensure the quality, validity, and significance of published research. This document outlines the complete submission and review workflow, from initial submission through to editorial decision. All manuscripts undergo single-blind peer review, where reviewers know the authors' identities but authors do not know the reviewers' identities.

Submission Process

Online Submission System

All manuscripts must be submitted through the journal's online submission system powered by Open Journal Systems (OJS) at https://greensusmater.com.

Account Registration

First-time users must create an account:

1. Click "Register" on the journal homepage
2. Complete the registration form with accurate information
3. Select your role: Author (and Reviewer if you wish to review for the journal)
4. Verify your email address through the confirmation link sent to your inbox

Returning users can log in with their existing credentials.

Submission Steps

The submission process consists of five main steps:

Step 1: Start Submission

• Select the article type from the dropdown menu (Research Article, Review Article, Short Communication)
• Review and confirm compliance with submission requirements
• Confirm that the manuscript has not been previously published or is under consideration elsewhere
• Agree to the journal's copyright and licensing terms

Step 2: Upload Submission

• Upload your manuscript as a single Word document (.docx or .doc) containing all elements as specified in the Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
• The system accepts files up to 20 MB
• Ensure the file is properly formatted and includes line numbering

Step 3: Enter Metadata

Provide complete and accurate information:

Title and Abstract:

• Enter the full manuscript title
• Paste the complete abstract (200-300 words)
• Do not include formatting or special characters that may not display properly

Contributors:

• Add all co-authors in the correct order
• Provide full names, email addresses, institutional affiliations, and ORCID iDs
• Clearly designate the corresponding author
• You can reorder authors by dragging and dropping

Keywords:

• Enter 4-6 keywords separated by semicolons
• Use lowercase except for proper nouns
• Choose specific, searchable terms

Supporting Agencies (if applicable):

• List funding sources with grant numbers

References:

• Paste your complete reference list in the numbered format

Step 4: Upload Supplementary Files (Optional)

If your manuscript includes supplementary materials:

• Upload each file separately
• Provide descriptive filenames
• Select the appropriate file type (Supplementary Data, Supplementary Figure, etc.)
• Ensure total file size does not exceed 100 MB

Step 5: Confirmation

• Review all entered information carefully
• Make any necessary corrections by returning to previous steps
• Submit a brief cover letter (optional but recommended)
• Click "Finish Submission"
• You will receive an automatic confirmation email with your manuscript ID

Cover Letter (Optional but Recommended)

While not mandatory, a cover letter can strengthen your submission. Include:

• A brief statement of the manuscript's significance and novelty
• Explanation of how the work fits the journal's scope
• Declaration that the work has not been published elsewhere and is not under consideration at another journal
• Disclosure of any potential conflicts of interest
• Suggestions for potential reviewers (optional) or requests to exclude specific reviewers (with justification)

Post-Submission

After submission:

• You will receive a confirmation email with your manuscript tracking number
• You can log in anytime to check the status of your submission
• The system will send automated emails at key stages of the review process
• All correspondence regarding your manuscript will use the manuscript tracking number

Initial Editorial Screening

Desk Review Process

Upon submission, the manuscript undergoes an initial editorial assessment by the Editor-in-Chief or a designated Section Editor. This typically occurs within 5-7 days of submission.

Screening Criteria

Manuscripts are evaluated based on:

Scope and Relevance:

• Does the manuscript fall within the journal's scope of green and sustainable materials?
• Is the topic of interest to the journal's readership?
• Does it contribute new knowledge or insights to the field?

Scientific Quality:

• Is the research question clearly defined and significant?
• Are the methods appropriate and adequately described?
• Are the conclusions supported by the data?

Ethical Compliance:

• Has necessary ethical approval been obtained (if applicable)?
• Are conflicts of interest properly disclosed?
• Does the manuscript comply with publication ethics standards?

Technical Requirements:

• Does the manuscript follow the journal's formatting guidelines?
• Is the English language quality adequate?
• Are all required sections and statements included?

Originality Check:

• All submissions are screened using plagiarism detection software
• Manuscripts with similarity index >20% (excluding references and standard methodology) are carefully reviewed
• Significant overlap with previous publications may result in desk rejection

Desk Review Outcomes

Proceed to Peer Review: The manuscript meets basic criteria and will be sent for external peer review.

Desk Rejection: The manuscript does not meet the journal's requirements or standards. Common reasons include:

• Outside the journal's scope
• Serious methodological or ethical concerns
• Poor English language quality preventing adequate review
• High similarity index indicating plagiarism or excessive self-plagiarism
• Incomplete submission or failure to follow guidelines
• Scientifically unsound

Authors of desk-rejected manuscripts receive feedback on the reasons for rejection and are welcome to submit a different manuscript in the future.

Peer Review Process

Review Model: Single-Blind Review

Greensusmater uses a single-blind peer review model:

• Reviewers know the identities of the authors
• Authors do not know the identities of the reviewers
• This model balances objectivity with practical considerations in reviewer recruitment

Reviewer Selection

The handling editor selects reviewers based on:

• Expertise relevant to the manuscript's topic and methodology
• Publication record in the field
• Geographic and institutional diversity
• No conflicts of interest with the authors
• Previous review quality (for returning reviewers)

Minimum of 2 reviewers are invited for each manuscript. If the two reviewers provide conflicting recommendations, a third reviewer may be consulted.

Reviewer Invitation Process

1. Selected reviewers receive an email invitation with the manuscript title and abstract
2. Reviewers are asked to accept or decline within 3-5 days
3. If a reviewer declines, alternative reviewers are contacted
4. Upon acceptance, reviewers receive the full manuscript and review form

Review Timeline

Reviewers are requested to complete their review within 2-4 weeks. The handling editor monitors review progress and sends reminders as needed.

Review Criteria

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on:

Originality and Significance:

• Does the work present novel findings or new perspectives?
• Is the research question important and timely?
• Does it advance the field of green and sustainable materials?

Scientific Rigor:

• Are the objectives clearly stated?
• Are the methods appropriate, well-described, and reproducible?
• Is the study design sound?
• Are the characterization techniques appropriate and sufficient?
• Are the results presented clearly and logically?

Interpretation and Conclusions:

• Are the conclusions supported by the data?
• Are alternative explanations considered?
• Are limitations adequately discussed?
• Are broader implications appropriately addressed?

Presentation Quality:

• Is the manuscript well-organized and clearly written?
• Are figures and tables appropriate, clear, and properly labeled?
• Are references appropriate and properly cited?

Review Report

Reviewers provide:

• Recommendation: Accept, Minor Revisions, Major Revisions, Reject
• Confidential comments to the editor: Assessment of the manuscript's suitability and priority for publication
• Comments to the authors: Detailed, constructive feedback on strengths and weaknesses, with specific suggestions for improvement

Editorial Decision

Decision Timeline

Once reviews are received, the handling editor evaluates the manuscript and reviewer comments, typically within 1-2 weeks, and makes a recommendation to the Editor-in-Chief, who makes the final decision.

Types of Editorial Decisions

Accept:

• The manuscript is accepted for publication without revisions (rare)
• Proceeds immediately to production

Minor Revisions Required:

• Small changes needed that do not require re-review
• Examples: clarifications, additional references, minor data presentation improvements
• Authors typically have 2-4 weeks to submit revisions
• Revised manuscript is reviewed by the handling editor only

Major Revisions Required:

• Substantial changes needed, such as additional experiments, reanalysis, significant rewriting, or structural reorganization
• Authors typically have 4-8 weeks to submit revisions (extensions available upon request)
• Revised manuscript typically returns to the original reviewers for re-evaluation

Reject:

• The manuscript does not meet the journal's standards for publication
• Major flaws in methodology, interpretation, or presentation that cannot be adequately addressed through revision
• Insufficient novelty or significance
• Better suited for a different journal

Decision Communication

Authors receive an email notification with:

• The editorial decision
• Reviewer comments (anonymized)
• Specific instructions for revision (if applicable)
• Deadline for submitting revisions
• Guidance on how to respond to reviewer comments

Revision Process

Submitting Revisions

For manuscripts requiring revision, authors must submit:

1. Revised manuscript with tracked changes: Use Word's "Track Changes" feature to highlight all modifications
2. Clean version of the revised manuscript: Final version without markup
3. Point-by-point response to reviewers: A separate document addressing each reviewer comment individually
4. Updated supplementary materials (if applicable)

Response to Reviewers

The response document should:

• Quote each reviewer comment
• Provide a detailed response explaining how the comment was addressed
• Indicate specific location of changes in the revised manuscript (page and line numbers)
• If you disagree with a comment, provide a respectful, evidence-based explanation

Format Example:

Revision Deadline and Extensions

Standard deadlines:

• Minor revisions: 2-4 weeks
• Major revisions: 4-8 weeks

Extension requests:

• Extension requests are accepted and should be submitted before the deadline
• Contact the editorial office via the submission system with justification
• Typical extensions: 2-4 additional weeks
• Manuscripts not revised within the extended deadline may be administratively closed (but can be resubmitted as new)

Transfer and Cascading Review

If your manuscript is not accepted for publication in Greensusmater, we offer options to support your path to publication:

Review Report Sharing

Portable peer review: Upon rejection, authors receive:

• Complete anonymized reviewer reports
• Editorial assessment
• Permission to use these reports when submitting to other journals

Journal Transfer Service

Partner journals: We have transfer agreements with the following journals in related fields:

• Green and Sustainable Environments
• Green and Sustainable Membranes

Transfer process:

• Editor may suggest transfer to a more suitable partner journal
• If interested, author provides consent via the submission system
• Manuscript, review reports, and metadata are securely transferred
• Receiving journal may use existing reviews or conduct new review

Appeals Process

Grounds for Appeal

Authors may appeal an editorial decision if they believe:

• Reviewers misunderstood key aspects of the manuscript
• Reviewers lacked appropriate expertise
• The decision was based on incorrect factual information
• New data or analyses address the reviewers' concerns
• Procedural errors occurred during review

How to Submit an Appeal

1. Timing: Appeals must be submitted within 30 days of the decision notification
2. Submission: Send via email to the Editor-in-Chief
3. Content: Include:
   • Manuscript tracking number
   • Original decision letter
   • Detailed letter explaining specific grounds for appeal
   • Point-by-point response to reviewer comments (if applicable)
   • Any new data or analyses (if relevant)

Appeal Review Process

1. Initial assessment: Editor-in-Chief reviews the appeal (5-7 days)
2. Independent review: If the appeal has merit, the manuscript is reviewed by editorial board members not involved in the original decision
3. Decision: The appeal decision is final and typically communicated within 3-4 weeks
4. Outcomes:
   • Appeal upheld: Manuscript reconsidered (may be sent for additional review)
   • Appeal denied: Original decision stands
   • Partial appeal: Opportunity to revise and resubmit with specific guidance

Tracking Your Submission

Submission Dashboard

Authors can monitor their manuscript status through the OJS dashboard:

Active Submissions:

• View current stage of review
• See assigned editor
• Access decision letters and reviewer comments
• Upload revised manuscripts

Status Indicators:

• Submitted: Awaiting initial editorial screening
• In Review: Undergoing peer review
• Revisions Required: Awaiting author revisions
• Revisions Submitted: Revised manuscript under review
• Accepted: Accepted for publication
• Declined: Not accepted for publication

Communication

All official communication occurs through the OJS system. Authors receive email notifications for:

• Submission confirmation
• Initial decision (accept for review or desk reject)
• Reviewer reports received
• Editorial decision
• Reminders about revision deadlines
• Final acceptance

After Acceptance

Overview

Congratulations on having your manuscript accepted for publication in Greensusmater! This section outlines the steps from acceptance to final publication. The typical timeline from acceptance to online publication is 2-4 weeks, after which your article will be included in the next scheduled issue for full publication.

Acceptance Notification

Upon acceptance of your manuscript, you will receive an email from the Editor-in-Chief or handling editor containing:

• Formal acceptance notification
• Overview of the next steps
• Instructions for completing post-acceptance requirements
• Expected timeline for publication
• Contact information for production-related queries

What happens next: Your manuscript enters the production workflow, where it will be professionally copyedited, typeset, and prepared for publication.

Copyright and Licensing Agreement

Automatic License Agreement

As Greensusmater operates under a Gold Open Access model with CC BY 4.0 licensing, authors retain copyright of their work while granting the journal a non-exclusive license to publish and distribute the article.

Your agreement was confirmed during manuscript submission when you checked the submission requirements box stating:

What This Means

By accepting publication, you confirm that:

• Authors retain copyright: You own the copyright to your work
• Non-exclusive license: You grant the journal the right to publish and distribute your article under CC BY 4.0
• Co-author agreement: All co-authors have approved the submission and publication
• Ethical compliance: The work meets all ethical standards outlined in the journal's Publication Ethics Statement
• Originality: The work is original and has not been published elsewhere

ORCID Verification

To ensure proper attribution and discoverability, please verify that all co-authors' ORCID iDs are correctly listed in the submission system. If any co-author does not have an ORCID iD, they can register for free at https://orcid.org.

Third-Party Materials

If your manuscript includes materials (figures, tables, extensive quotations) from other copyrighted sources:

• Written permission from copyright holders must be obtained
• Submit permission letters via the submission system
• Include proper attribution in figure/table captions
• Notify the editorial office if permissions are pending

Article Processing Charge (APC) Payment

The standard APC for Greensusmater is USD $200. However, the APC is currently waived for all submissions. Authors are encouraged to check the journal website for the latest APC waiver status. If the waiver expires, payment will be due upon acceptance of the manuscript, prior to publication.

Production Process

Once the license agreement is confirmed, your manuscript enters professional production.

Copyediting

Scope: Your manuscript undergoes moderate copyediting, which includes:

• Grammar, spelling, and punctuation corrections
• Consistency in terminology, style, and formatting
• Adherence to journal style guidelines
• Clarity improvements in sentence structure
• Verification of references and citations
• Checking figure and table numbering and citations

Language Editing: The copyeditor will improve language clarity while preserving your intended meaning and scientific accuracy.

Timeline: Copyediting typically takes 5-7 days.

Author Review (Optional): For manuscripts requiring substantial language editing, authors may be asked to review the copyedited version. If required, you will have 3 days to review and approve changes.

Typesetting and Formatting

Professional Layout: Your manuscript is professionally formatted into publication-ready formats:

• PDF: Final paginated version with journal style
• HTML: Web-optimized version for online reading
• Professional layout with journal branding
• High-quality rendering of figures and tables
• Proper formatting of equations and special characters

Metadata Preparation: Essential information is prepared for indexing and discovery:

• Author names and affiliations
• ORCID iDs
• Keywords and subject classifications
• Abstract and references
• Funding information

DOI Assignment: A unique Digital Object Identifier (DOI) is assigned to your article, ensuring permanent accessibility and proper citation.

Timeline: Typesetting takes 3-5 days.

Author Proof Review

Receiving Proofs

Once typesetting is complete, you will receive galley proofs (PDF and HTML versions) via email with instructions for review.

Review Period: You have 5 days to review and return corrections.

What to Check

During proof review, carefully check for:

Critical Errors Only:

• Typographical errors introduced during production
• Incorrect data, numbers, or values
• Missing or incorrect figures/tables
• Errors in author names, affiliations, or ORCID iDs
• Broken or incorrect references
• Missing acknowledgments or funding information
• Incorrect equation rendering
• Missing or incorrect scale bars in micrographs

DO NOT make:

• Scientific revisions or new interpretations
• Additions of new data or references
• Restructuring of content
• Style or wording preferences (unless affecting scientific accuracy)
• Extensive language changes

Submitting Corrections

How to submit:

1. Download the proof PDF
2. Mark corrections clearly using comment/annotation tools
3. List all corrections in a separate document with page and line numbers
4. Submit via the submission system or email to production team

Format for corrections:

Deadline: Corrections must be submitted within 5 days. Late submissions may delay publication.

Important Reminders

• This is your final opportunity to identify errors before publication
• Focus on accuracy rather than style preferences
• Extensive changes at this stage may require additional fees and will delay publication
• If no corrections are needed, you must still confirm approval of the proofs
• Failure to respond within 5 days may result in publication without your final approval

Final Publication

Online First Publication

Once proofs are approved and any corrections are made:

Immediate Publication:

• Your article is published online within 2-4 weeks of acceptance
• Receives full citation details (authors, title, journal name, DOI)
• Immediately accessible to readers worldwide under CC BY 4.0 license
• Fully citable using the DOI
• Indexed and discoverable through databases and search engines

Online First Status:

• Articles are designated as "Online First" or "Articles in Press"
• Will be assigned to an upcoming issue but are fully published and citable
• Pagination may be tentative until final issue compilation

Full Issue Publication

Issue Assignment:

• Your article will be included in the next scheduled issue (biannually as per journal schedule)
• Receives final volume, issue, and page numbers
• Compiled with other articles in a complete issue

No Embargo: There is no embargo period. Your article is immediately open access upon online first publication.

Publication Notification

You will receive email confirmation when:

• Your article is published online first
• Your article is included in the final issue

The email will include:

• Direct link to your published article
• Complete citation information
• DOI and permanent URL
• Instructions for downloading and sharing

Post-Publication Services

Dissemination and Promotion

Automatic Indexing: Your article is automatically:

• Submitted to major indexing services (Google Scholar, Crossref, etc.)
• Deposited in PKP Preservation Network for long-term archiving
• Made discoverable through library catalogs and databases

Social Media Promotion:

• The journal promotes all published articles through official social media channels
• Articles are featured with title, authors, and key findings
• Authors are tagged when possible (provide social media handles for tagging)

Author Promotion:

Authors are encouraged to:

• Share their published article via social media using the DOI link
• Deposit the article in institutional or subject repositories
• Present findings at conferences and cite the published version
• Update their ORCID profile with the publication

Article Metrics and Impact

Metrics Available:

• Download statistics (updated monthly)
• Citation counts (from CrossRef, Google Scholar)
• Altmetrics (social media mentions, news coverage)
• Geographic distribution of readers

Access: View metrics on the article page or through your author dashboard (if available).

Post-Publication Corrections and Updates

Types of Post-Publication Changes

Despite careful review, errors may occasionally be discovered after publication. The journal follows COPE guidelines for post-publication corrections.

Erratum (Journal Error):

• Errors introduced by the journal during production (typesetting, editing)
• Published as a separate notice linked to the original article
• Original article marked with correction notice

Corrigendum (Author Error):

• Errors in the original manuscript that do not affect the main conclusions
• Authors submit a correction notice
• Subject to editorial review and approval
• Published as a separate notice linked to the original article

Retraction:

• For serious errors, ethical violations, or misconduct that invalidate findings
• Follows strict COPE guidelines
• Original article remains online but clearly marked as retracted
• Detailed retraction notice published explaining reasons

Requesting a Correction

If you discover an error after publication:

1. Contact the editorial office immediately at aditya.rianjanu@mt.itera.ac.id
2. Provide details:
   • Article DOI and title
   • Specific error with location (page, line, figure)
   • Proposed correction
   • Assessment of whether the error affects conclusions
3. Editor review: The editor evaluates the significance of the error
4. Correction process: Appropriate correction type is determined and published

Minor corrections (typos not affecting meaning) may be silently corrected in the online version with a note in the article history.

Version of Record and Archiving

Version of Record (VOR)

The final published version of your article (PDF and HTML) is the Version of Record:

• Assigned a permanent DOI
• Accessible via a persistent URL
• The authoritative version for citation and reference
• Protected from alteration (corrections are published separately)

Long-Term Preservation

Your article is preserved through:

PKP Preservation Network (PKP PN):

• Automatic deposit upon publication
• Distributed preservation across geographically diverse nodes
• Ensures long-term accessibility even if the journal ceases publication
• No action required from authors

Institutional Repositories:

• Authors may deposit the Version of Record in institutional or subject repositories
• No embargo period
• Must include proper citation and DOI link

Author Responsibilities After Publication

Monitoring and Responding

Respond to reader inquiries: You may receive questions or comments about your article. Responding professionally enhances the impact of your work.

Monitor citations: Track how your work is cited and used. Report any misrepresentations to the editorial office.

Update contact information: Notify the journal if your email or institutional affiliation changes to ensure you receive important communications.

Data Sharing

If you included a "Data Available on Request" statement, be prepared to:

• Respond promptly to reasonable data requests
• Provide data in accessible formats
• Maintain data availability for at least 5 years post-publication

Corrections and Clarifications

If you become aware of errors or receive substantive criticism:

• Evaluate whether a correction is needed
• Contact the editorial office promptly
• Provide thorough documentation

Conclusion

We are committed to ensuring a smooth and efficient publication process for your article. By following these guidelines and meeting the specified deadlines, your research will be disseminated rapidly to the global scientific community.

Thank you for choosing Greensusmater for publication. We look forward to sharing your important contributions to green and sustainable materials science with the world.

Contact Information

For any inquiries regarding manuscript submissions, please contact:

• Journal Website: https://greensusmater.com
• Editorial Contact: Aditya Rianjanu — aditya.rianjanu@mt.itera.ac.id
• Publisher: Green and Sustainable Materials Society (GSMS), Terusan Ryacudu, Way Hui, Jati Agung, Lampung Selatan, 35365, Indonesia